Talk:Eight options with six sides: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "== This seems too easy == Determining the <i>least</i> number of rolls he <i>will</i> have to make is so trivial I wouldn't even call it a puzzle. Determining the <i>greatest</i..." |
Oscarlevin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
As far as I can tell, I'm not missing anything. [[User:Zerrakhi|Zerrakhi]] 03:43, 22 October 2010 (EDT) | As far as I can tell, I'm not missing anything. [[User:Zerrakhi|Zerrakhi]] 03:43, 22 October 2010 (EDT) | ||
: Hmmm. I'm not seeing this as easy. Perhaps I am missing something. That or I worded the question in an unclear way. Could you tell me what you think the answer is? That would help me understand what is going on here. [[User:Oscarlevin|Oscarlevin]] 15:03, 18 November 2010 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 13:03, 18 November 2010
This seems too easy
Determining the least number of rolls he will have to make is so trivial I wouldn't even call it a puzzle. Determining the greatest number of rolls he may have to make is a slightly less trivial, but still very simple. One can optimise either of these values or both of them. Perhaps one for Category:Easy puzzles?
As far as I can tell, I'm not missing anything. Zerrakhi 03:43, 22 October 2010 (EDT)
- Hmmm. I'm not seeing this as easy. Perhaps I am missing something. That or I worded the question in an unclear way. Could you tell me what you think the answer is? That would help me understand what is going on here. Oscarlevin 15:03, 18 November 2010 (EST)