|
|
| (22 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| == Solutions over multiple lines ==
| |
|
| |
|
| I visited the site following the link in your comments on Richard Wiseman's most recent Friday Puzzle solution, and thought I'd see if I could contribute.
| |
|
| |
| However, I can't contribute a solution because the wiki won't accept a solution that takes more than one line. For example, this doesn't work:
| |
|
| |
| <pre>{{Solution |
| |
| solution
| |
| over
| |
| multiple
| |
| lines
| |
| }}</pre>
| |
|
| |
| Pretty much all solutions will require multiple lines, so this is a real problem. I assume a "solution" means an answer with working, whereas an "answer" is just the answer by itself.
| |
|
| |
| Below is my solution to the "7_orbs" puzzle, which I tried to contribute:
| |
|
| |
| <small>
| |
| :Let A = set of orbs for which there are 3 or more others the same colour.
| |
| :Let B = set of orbs for which there are 1 or 2 others the same colour.
| |
| :Let X = set of orbs for which there are no others the same colour.
| |
|
| |
| :Goal is to prove that some orb is in A.
| |
|
| |
| :Possible combinations:
| |
| :(using the shorthand that A denotes an orb that's in A, etc)
| |
|
| |
| :A A A A A A A
| |
| :A A A A A A X
| |
| :A A A A A B B
| |
| :A A A A A X X
| |
| :A A A A B B B
| |
| :A A A A B B X
| |
| :A A A A X X X
| |
|
| |
| :Label the orbs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and test 1&2, 3&4, 5&6.
| |
|
| |
| :Comparing the results of testing those three pairs with the possible combinations, you can easily show that:
| |
|
| |
| :If two tested pairs glow the same colour, all members of those pairs are in A
| |
| :If only one of the three tested pairs glows, members of that pair are in A
| |
| :If two tested pairs glow different colours and the other doesn't glow, orb 7 is in A
| |
| :If no tested pairs glow, orb 7 is in A.
| |
|
| |
| :In all cases, three tests suffice to prove that some orb is in A.
| |
|
| |
| :The only other thing required is to prove that two tests are not necessarily sufficient, which is trivial.
| |
| </small>
| |
|
| |
| Is that the sort of thing you're looking for? [[User:Zerrakhi|Zerrakhi]] 12:16, 11 October 2010 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| : Yes that is the sort of thing I'm looking for. I'll see if I can fix the multiple lines problem. [[User:Oscarlevin|Oscarlevin]] 15:06, 11 October 2010 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| : So I can't seem to replicate your problem. Is it just that the lines are not breaking? Like this:
| |
| {{Solution |
| |
| solution
| |
| over
| |
| multiple
| |
| lines
| |
| }}
| |
| : Because that can be fixed will a line break between them, as in:
| |
|
| |
| {{Solution |
| |
| solution
| |
|
| |
| over
| |
|
| |
| multiple
| |
|
| |
| lines
| |
| }}
| |
| : Or is there some other problem? [[User:Oscarlevin|Oscarlevin]] 15:25, 11 October 2010 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| == No link in email ==
| |
|
| |
| The email received upon registration, the one containing the words "open this link in your browser", does not actually contain any links or URLs to open! [[User:Zerrakhi|Zerrakhi]] 12:27, 11 October 2010 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
| : Did the email you get contain a bunch of <nowiki><math></math></nowiki> tags? I'm using an extension that switches dollar signs to math mode (ala LaTeX), and it has screwed up a lot of the system messages. I'll see if I can fix this too. [[User:Oscarlevin|Oscarlevin]] 15:06, 11 October 2010 (EDT)
| |