Difference between revisions of "Bags of gems"

From Math Puzzle Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 648 by Ocafaromy (talk))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
----
 
<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;">
 
----
 
=[http://utugijynure.co.cc Page Is Unavailable Due To Site Maintenance, Please Visit Reserve Copy Page]=
 
----
 
=[http://utugijynure.co.cc CLICK HERE]=
 
----
 
</div>
 
 
Here is another one I found in Smullian's book.
 
Here is another one I found in Smullian's book.
  

Current revision as of 18:15, 23 November 2010

Here is another one I found in Smullian's book.

Puzzle

You have ten bags of gems. Each bag contains three gems, which are either diamonds, rubies, or emeralds. As it happens, no two of the ten bags have exactly the same combination of these gems. For instance, one bag contains three diamonds, another contains two rubies and an emerald, another contains one of each.

You reach into one of the bags, and happen to pull out a diamond. You are now allowed to pull one stone out of any of the ten bags. If that second stone is also a diamond, you get to keep it. Otherwise, you get nothing. Are you better off taking the second stone from the bag you first pulled the diamond out of, or out of one of the other nine bags?

References

The Riddle of Scheherazade: And Other Amazing Puzzles by Raymond Smullyan.